Saturday, February 18, 2006
Law - Dad sues to prevent son's circumcision
The Chicago Tribune reports today that:
A Cook County judge Friday ordered a mother not to circumcise her 8-year-old son until the court can hear arguments from the child's father, who opposes the operation, and decide whether it is in the boy's best interests.
The mother, a 31-year-old homemaker from Northbrook, says two doctors have recommended the procedure to prevent recurrent infections. Her ex-husband, a 49-year-old building manager who lives in Arlington Heights, calls the operation an "unnecessary amputation" that could cause his son physical and emotional harm.
* * *
Circumcision, in which the foreskin of the penis is surgically removed, usually before a newborn leaves the hospital, was extremely common in the U.S. during the last century. But the percentage of U.S. babies being circumcised has gone down from an estimated 90 percent in 1970 to some 60 percent today.
The American Academy of Pediatrics no longer recommends routine neonatal circumcision but says the decision should be left up to the parents.
In recent years, the procedure has come under fire from a small but vocal group who believe it is the equivalent of female genital mutilation. They argue, in an increasing number of legal challenges, that the procedure is medically unnecessary and morally indefensible.
There are no published U.S. opinions to serve as precedents for the current case.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on February 18, 2006 08:35 AM
Posted to General Law Related