« Environment - Still more on "Huntington County dairy coming under new management" | Main | Law - Soul singer James Brown and the right of publicity »
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Courts - The Supreme Court and its conundrum of continuity and change
Linda Greenhouse, who is soon to leave the NY Times after 30 years, offers reflections and a personal overview of the Supreme Court's work titled "2,691 Decisions." Here is a sample:
[I]t is often the court that eventually retreats when it finds itself out of sync with the prevailing mood. That appeared to be the case with the “federalism revolution” that Chief Justice Rehnquist began in the mid-1990s. In a series of 5-to-4 decisions, the court declared that Congress did not have the power it assumed it had to make federal statutes binding on the states. These decisions, reflecting the chief justice’s longstanding goal to re-adjust the post-New Deal federal-state balance, signaled an abrupt jurisprudential shift.But then 9/11 happened and the national mood changed. Suddenly, the federal government looked useful, even necessary. The Supreme Court’s federalism revolution had been overtaken by events. In 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote for a 6-to-3 majority that Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it said state governments could be sued for failing to give their employees the benefits required by the Family and Medical Leave Act. It was a decision of enormous symbolic significance. Without apology or much in the way of explanation, the chief justice gave up the fight and moved on.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on July 13, 2008 09:50 AM
Posted to Courts in general