« Ind. Court - CCR Filed for SB149 removes language re placement of children by juvenile courts outside of Indiana | Main | Ind. Law - What happened ... »
Friday, March 12, 2010
Courts - Still more on "Test Case Linking Vaccines and Autism Reaches Federal Court"
Updating this ILB entry from June 10, 2007, the LA Times reports today, in a story by Thomas H. Maugh II and Andrew Zaja, headed "'Vaccines court' rejects mercury-autism link in 3 test cases." The story begins:
Reporting from Washington and Los AngelesAlso, on Monday the SCOTUS granted cert in "Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, in which the Court will consider whether and when vaccine manufacturers can be sued outside of the special “vaccine court” established by Congress to address vaccine-related injuries." Per SCOTUSblog. More here.
The federal "vaccines court" ruled Friday in three separate cases that the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal does not cause autism, a finding that supports the broad scientific consensus on the matter but that greatly disappointed parents who are convinced that their child's illness was caused by vaccines.The court had ruled 13 months ago that a combination of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, commonly known as the MMR vaccine, and thimerosal does not cause the disorder, so the new ruling may finally close the bulk of litigation on the matter. The earlier ruling has been appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, and this one most likely will be also, but most experts think the court will uphold the decision.
A claim that the MMR vaccine alone causes autism has been withdrawn by parents.
More than 5,300 parents had filed claims with the vaccines court, a branch of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, seeking damages because they believed their children had developed autism as a result of vaccinations. And they reacted bitterly to Friday's ruling.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on March 12, 2010 07:59 PM
Posted to Courts in general