« Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 2 today (and 11 NFP) | Main | Courts - "Should Supreme Court Opinions Be Anonymous?" »
Monday, April 26, 2010
Courts - "Justices Take Case on Video Game Law"
The NY Times has just posted an AP story reporting:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court, wading into a thicket of free-speech and children's rights issues, agreed Monday to decide whether California can ban the sale or rental of violent video games to minors.ILB: Surprising indeed. The 7th Circuit in 2001 threw out an Indianapolis ordinance that regulated violent video games. For background, check these ILB entries:The court will review a federal court's decision to throw out California's ban. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Sacramento said the law violated minors' constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth amendments.
California's law would have prohibited the sale or rental of violent games to anyone under 18. It also would have created strict labeling requirements for video game manufacturers. Retailers who violated the act would have been fined up to $1,000 for each violation.
The law never took effect, and was challenged shortly after it was signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. A U.S. District Court blocked it after the industry sued the state, citing constitutional concerns.
Opponents of the law note that video games already are labeled with a rating system that lets parents decide what games their children can purchase and play. They also argue that the video games are protected forms of expression under the First Amendment.
The high court's action Monday was surprising, given that justices just last week voted 8-1 to strike down a federal law that banned videos showing animal cruelty. The California case poses similar free speech concerns, although the state law is aimed at protecting children, raising an additional issue that affect the high court's consideration.
California lawmakers approved the law, in part, by relying on several studies suggesting violent games can be linked to aggression, anti-social behavior and desensitization to violence in children. But federal judges have dismissed that research. * * *
But courts in other states have struck down similar laws. * * *
The case is Schwarzenegger v. Video Software Dealers Association, 08-1448.
- Dec. 3, 2005 - "Federal judge strikes down Illinois law on video games; Bayh backs federal legislation; Michigan injunction; earlier Indianapolis effort."
- Feb. 20, 2007 - "Ind. Law - Another year, another effort to ban video games."
- Feb. 21, 2009 - "9th Circuit strikes down California violent video game ban."
- May 26, 2009 - "More on 9th Circuit strikes down California violent video game ban."
Posted by Marcia Oddi on April 26, 2010 11:28 AM
Posted to Courts in general