« Ind. Courts - FWJG editorial looks at judicial campaigns | Main | Environment - "Opponents warn of dangers of hog industry growth Indiana's hog industry has grown -- but CAFO opponents from North Carolina warn Hoosiers wouldn't want it to reach the level seen in their state" »

Monday, September 20, 2010

Courts - "Missouri Tells Judges Cost of Sentences"

A story dated Sept. 18, in the NY Times, reported by Monica Davey, begins:

ST. LOUIS — When judges here sentence convicted criminals, a new and unusual variable is available for them to consider: what a given punishment will cost the State of Missouri.

For someone convicted of endangering the welfare of a child, for instance, a judge might now learn that a three-year prison sentence would run more than $37,000 while probation would cost $6,770. A second-degree robber, a judge could be told, would carry a price tag of less than $9,000 for five years of intensive probation, but more than $50,000 for a comparable prison sentence and parole afterward. The bill for a murderer’s 30-year prison term: $504,690.

Legal experts say no other state systematically provides such information to judges, a practice put into effect here last month by the state’s sentencing advisory commission, an appointed board that offers guidance on criminal sentencing.

The practice has touched off a sharp debate. It has been lauded nationally by a disparate group of defense lawyers and fiscal conservatives, who consider it an overdue tool that will force judges to ponder alternatives to prison more seriously.

But critics — prosecutors especially — dismiss the idea as unseemly. They say that the cost of punishment is an irrelevant consideration when deciding a criminal’s fate and that there is a risk of overlooking the larger social costs of crime.

For additiotnal views, see the links and comments at the end of this entry in the Sentencing Law Blog.e

Posted by Marcia Oddi on September 20, 2010 11:08 AM
Posted to Courts in general