Thursday, September 20, 2012
Ind. Decisions - "High Court Cuts Out Sentence Enhancement In Class Of Gun Crimes"
Another older decision, this one from July 31, 2012, is the subject of a story today by Jeff Neumeyer at the Indiana News Center. Although the story does not identify the decision, it is Anthony H. Dye v. State of Indiana. Some quotes:
In at least one category of handgun prosecutions in Indiana, offenders are now shielded from a large punishment enhancement.
The change ordered by the state Supreme Court can take up to 30 years off the criminal sentence in some gun cases. * * *
The old rules allowed a prosecutor to seek up to twenty-years for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, and also go for another thirty-years under the habitual offender statute.
In July, the state's high court, in an Elkhart case, struck down the habitual offender “add on”, saying that represented an impermissible use of double enhancements.
Allen County's prosecutor thinks the change is misguided.
" This is a pretty heavy penalty, and frankly, isn't this exactly the kind of person that we want to give that penalty to? Isn't that the person that really is at the top of the list when it comes to community safety," said Karen Richards.
Prosecutor Richards believes the ruling only impacts cases going forward, but she concedes it's possible there could be an attempt by aggressive defense lawyers to try and re-open cases already wrapped up.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court found that the enhanced penalty could not be used in these cases, unless “explicit legislative direction” is provided.
Richards says she’s open to working with lawmakers to tweak the statute language, to try and make the habitual offender component applicable once again.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on September 20, 2012 10:41 AM
Posted to Ind. Sup.Ct. Decisions