Friday, January 11, 2013
Ind. Law - More on: Constitutional issues with several judiciary-related bills
Updating this ILB entry from January 9th, the ILB has received this correction from Lesley Stedman Weidenbener, Managing editor, TheStatehouseFile:
A story published by TheStatehouseFile.com on Wednesday should have said that a bill to remove a mandatory retirement age for the state’s appellate court justices would not affect Chief Justice Brent Dickson. The Indiana Constitution requires that appellate judges retire at the age specified by law at the start of their current term.A straight-up apology from an excellent student newsservice run by Franklin College. Here is a link to the corrected story in TheStatehouseFile (subscription required).
TheStatehouseFile.com regrets the error.
We are terribly sorry for the mistake but we always want to correct our errors. Please let us know if you ever run across a mistake we need to correct.
Thank you. -Lesley
Posted by Marcia Oddi on January 11, 2013 11:51 AM
Posted to Indiana Law