« Environment - New "Weed threat a potential 'train wreck'" | Main | Courts - Still more on "Hobby Lobby Wins Before En Banc Tenth Circuit" »

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Ind. Decisions - "Court splits parenthood in surrogate mother deal"

Thursday's Court of Appeals opinion in In the Matter of the Paternity and Maternity of Infant T. (ILB summary here) is the subject of a July 12th AP story by Charles Wilson. Some quotes:

The state appeals court has decided that in Indiana, a surrogate mother is the legal mother, even if the child was conceived with an egg from an unknown donor and everyone agreed for the baby to become a third woman's child.

In a 3-0 decision Thursday, the Indiana Court of Appeals agreed with a lower court that there was no state law that allowed a woman to "de-establish" the maternity of the surrogate, but overruled the judge's decision that the surrogate's husband was the child's legal father.

Under the arrangement set up by Monrovia attorney Steven Litz, the husband of a woman who could not conceive artificially fertilized an ovum, whose donor remained anonymous. A married surrogate mother carried and gave birth to the infant, who was to be given to the first couple.

The man who had donated the sperm and the surrogate mother and her husband, last October filed a petition to "establish paternity and de-establish maternity" in a Putnam County court. But the local judge threw out the agreement, holding that the birth mother was the legal mother and her husband was the legal father unless a paternity test proved otherwise.

The Court of Appeals overruled part of a Putnam County judge's decision and held that the first woman's husband, who is the biological father, has paternal rights.

However, Judge Edward Najam Jr. wrote Thursday that state law presumes the birth mother is the child's biological mother unless another woman can prove the infant is her genetic offspring.

The recognition of genetic parenthood resulted from the appellate court's 2010 decision that even if a surrogate mother is involved, a child's biological parents are the legal parents if they can prove the child is genetically theirs. [ILB - see below]

"But in this case, the biological mother is unknown," said Litz, whose Surrogate Mothers Inc. has arranged hundreds of surrogate pregnancies for couples across the U.S. and overseas. "This was a surrogate pregnancy with an egg transferred from an anonymous donor."

Litz said he offered genetic testing results that proved the surrogate mother was not the child's genetic parent.

Litz said Friday that he intends to ask the Indiana Supreme Court to review the decision, which he believes is the first such ruling in the U.S.

ILB: Here is a quote from the Infant T opinion:
However, our holding does not exclude the indirect disestablishment of maternity, such as in Infant R. The indirect disestablishment of maternity requires a putative mother to petition the court for the establishment of maternity and to prove her maternity by clear and convincing evidence, not simply by affidavit or stipulation. Infant R., 922 N.E.2d at 61-62. If the putative mother satisfies her burden of proof, the establishment of maternity in her would indirectly disestablish maternity in the birth mother.

Posted by Marcia Oddi on July 13, 2013 10:42 AM
Posted to Ind. App.Ct. Decisions