Friday, January 10, 2014
Courts - More on: After 8 years [now 9 years], Michigan courts are still litigating the meaning of the November 2004 constitutional amendment
A year ago, on January 9, 2013, the ILB has this post. It began:
After 8 years, Michigan courts are still litigating the meaning of the November 2004 amendment to the Michigan Constitution stating that “one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.”Issues include health insurance coverage of domestic partners. A check last evening with a source in Michigan revealed that litigation about the meaning of the constitutional provision continues, now NINE years later.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on January 10, 2014 08:19 AM
Posted to Courts in general