Monday, February 24, 2014
Ind. Decisions - Still more on: Supreme Court appoints special judge in Justice v. Justice case
Updating this ILB post from Friday, Feb. 21st, re the Feb. 18th pleading which the "Court has declined to make public because of concerns regarding Adm.Rule 9", the ILB has asked the Court's press officer:
I understand that the 18th filing has to be redacted before filing to take out minors' names to comply with Adm. Rule 9.The answer:
But some of us are confused as to who is the "the Petitioner" on the filing - Mr. or Mrs. Justice? Could you clarify please?
The filing on the 18th (which has not been made public due to AR 9) was made by Mr. Justice’s attorney.
Posted by Marcia Oddi on February 24, 2014 09:18 AM
Posted to Ind. Sup.Ct. Decisions