Thursday, March 06, 2014
Ind. Decisions - Supreme Court posts corrected version of Judge Brown disciplinary opinion
The Supreme Court has now posted a new version of the March 4th opinion in In re Brown, marked "Corrected on March 5, 2014." However, there is no indication of what is the correction.
Here is the March 4th ILB post linking to the earlier version.
[More] The correction is in the case docket:
THE ORIGINAL PER CURIAM OPINION HANDED DOWN IN THIS CASE ON
MARCH 4, 2014, CONTAINS A NON-SUBSTANTIVE OMISSION. SPECIFICALLY
THE NAME "ELIZABETH DAULTON" SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED AS ONE OF
THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS.
THIS INADVERTENT ERROR WAS CORRECTED BY A REVISED OPINION THAT
WAS DELIVERED TO THE CLERK WITH THIS NOTICE, AND THE CORRECTED
OPINION CONTAINS THE WORDS "CORRECTED ON MARCH 5, 2014" BENEATH
THE DATE OF THE OPINION. NO OTHER CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE
ACCORDINGLY, THE FOLLOWING SHALL OCCUR: (1) THIS NOTICE OF
CHANGE SHALL BE ENTERED ON THE CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY; (2)
ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD SHALL BE SERVED WITH A COPY OF THE
CORRECTED OPINION AND THIS NOTICE; (3) ARRANGEMENTS SHALL BE
MADE FOR REMOVING THE ORIGINAL OPINION FROM THE COURT'S WEBSITE
AND POSTING THE CORRECTED OPINION IN ITS PLACE; AND (4) A COPY
OF THIS NOTICE SHALL BE SENT TO THOMSON/REUTERS, LEXISNEXIS, AND
KEVIN S. SMITH, CLERK/ADMINSTRATOR
Posted by Marcia Oddi on March 6, 2014 10:06 AM
Posted to Ind. Sup.Ct. Decisions