Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Ind. Gov't. - "Public debate Tuesday in Lawrence about gay marriage's legality in Kansas" features Indiana Deputy AG
From the Lawrence Kansas Journal-World, a story by Elliot Hughes that begins:
At public debate Tuesday in Lawrence about gay marriage's legality in Kansas, a local attorney and Indiana's solicitor general predictably shared little common ground. But where they did come to agreement was where future court decisions would come down on the matter.
The consensus: It doesn't look good for states defending same-sex marriage bans.
"I assume that if a state supreme court or a circuit rules in favor of states, that the (U.S.) Supreme Court's hand will be forced, and I'm not optimistic about the state's chances in that event," said Thomas Fisher, who as Indiana's solicitor general argued in vain to preserve his state's ban before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals this past summer.
[Fisher] was joined at the Lawrence forum by attorney and Kansas University adjunct faculty member David Brown, as well as about 50 audience members at the Dole Institute of Politics to debate whether gay marriage should be governed by constitutional rights or states' rights. * * *
Brown, who specializes in working with same-sex couples in Kansas, stood in for a sick Roberta Kaplan, who represented Edie Windsor in the landmark United States v. Windsor case that struck down a section of the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013.
[Fisher] repeatedly framed same-sex marriage as an aspect of society that states have the right to regulate. He said states should prefer children to be raised by their biological parents, and that codifying marriage as one man and one woman is a way of encouraging that practice.
But Brown dismissed those arguments, saying plenty of heterosexual couples who are unable to have children, or do not intend to, are still legally allowed to wed. Marriage bans are simply a matter of equality and rights, he argued.
"The definition of marriage is it's a civil contract that entitles you to certain benefits and protections by law. Whether you're a heterosexual couple or a same-sex couple, that doesn't matter. You should be entitled to the same benefits."
Posted by Marcia Oddi on October 22, 2014 01:55 PM
Posted to Indiana Government